| Bit Index AI Betrug |Blog | Forum | Bibliography | Research links | Mailing list | About VERN | Log in |
Reply to comment
Netherlands Court Finds Criminal Liability and Sentences Two Youths for Theft of Virtual Goods
Our friends at MindBlizzard report that a Netherlands court has found criminal liability for the real-world theft of virtual goods from the hybrid free/paid MMO roleplaying game Runescape.
From the post at MindBlizzard:
[T]he court has reached a verdict and has sentenced two boys to conditional detention and civil services because of the virtual theft from the game Runescape. [T]he boys from Leeuwarden, at the time both 14 years old, forced a thirteen-year-old victim to hand over virtual goods, a mask and an amulet, and to transfer the items to their account. The thirteen year old had collected a large amount of credits with which artifacts could be purchased. The boys forced him to a house and there he was kicked and threatened with a knife, until he transferred the goods and credits.
One aspect of the case is particularly intriguing — according to MindBlizzard, “the lawyers argued during the meeting that virtual goods do not really exist, and transferring [them] does not conflict with the rules of the game, but the court thought otherwise.” The Associated Press reports that the court confirmed this analysis in a summary of its ruling: “These virtual goods are goods (under Dutch law), so this is theft.” That’s interesting, and for better or worse, one small step toward more widespread recognition of virtual goods as something more than just mere ones and zeros owned by the company hosting them. The court could have ducked this aspect of the case and simply sentenced the kids for assault, but apparently the question of the nature of virtual personal property actually came up, and the court had no issue with the concept.
The original source for this is an article in Webwereld (and the translation by Google), but nobody seems to have the any documents from the court. I’m not sure if courts in the Netherlands put documents online (probably unlikely in juvenile matters) but if anyone manages to track down anything official, send me a copy and I’ll host it here.
[Updated 10/22: A VB reader found the original court opinion and put a link to a Google translation in the comments. Thanks!]Reply
Explore these sites
- Casino Not On Gamstop
- Online Casino
- Sites Not On Gamstop
- UK Casino Not On Gamstop
- Casino En Ligne France
- Casino Sites Not On Gamstop
- Sites Not On Gamstop
- UK Casino Not On Gamstop
- Non Gamstop Casinos
- Non Gamstop Casinos
- Online Casinos
- Online Casinos Not On Gamstop
- Non-gamstop Casino
- Non Gamstop Casinos
- Casino Online Non Aams
- Casas De Apuestas Nuevas En Colombia
- Casinos En Ligne
- Non Gamstop Casinos
- Non Gamstop Casinos UK
- Non Gamstop Casino Sites UK
- Non Gamstop Casinos
- Best Non Gamstop Casinos
- Migliori Casino Online
- Betting Sites Not On Gamstop
- Casino Crypto
- Nouveau Casino Belge En Ligne
- лучшие крипто казино
- Casino En Ligne Bonus Sans Depot France
- Casino En Ligne
- Bonus Casino Sans Depot
- Casino Senza Invio Documenti
- Meilleur Casino En Ligne
- Casino En Ligne Cresus
- Casino En Ligne Français
- Casino En Ligne Argent Réel
- Casino En Ligne Fiable
- Crypto Casino
- Migliori Siti Di Poker Online Al Mondo
- オンラインカジノ
- Siti Scommesse
- Casino En Ligne
- Migliori App Di Poker
- Casino En Ligne France
